Imagine, if you can,
yourself losing a leg as a result of gangrene due to deep multiple shrapnel
penetrations, which, in itself was a result of the shell explosion, say at
Mukden in 1905, then see hundreds of your fellow soldiers killed or maimed in
the extreme. Imagine, if you can, the level of pain and traumatic stress, with
allowance for the medicine of circa 1900 and then imagine what will you tell
your sweet-heart in the village somewhere in Russia when you will get back from
the front. Imagine you, illiterate, now facing some grim options related to
survival, with some of them including highly probable one of ending up begging for
pocket change and food at the stairs of some church. This is a reality which
very many faced during Russo-Japanese War. At least, since Crimean War the use
of ether became a norm and one could survive a pain shock during amputation or
extraction of the bullets or shell fragments from the body. You are not alone
in this, thousands upon thousands like you flood Russian villages and cities in
1905 after a military disaster at the Far East of Russian Empire. Of course,
you have a story to tell and, while walking on crutches, a blame to blame. But
that is not all, by far not all. In fact, Japanese propaganda in 1905 nailed it
perfectly. Having a hindsight it is easy to see that, as much as it is painful
to Russian heart to admit, Japanese were well aware (well, partially thanks to
British intelligence) of the state of Russian Empire.
Now imagine, if you are a
low level, literate, clerk in some Russian town and you read newspapers,
supporting Russian Army and Fleet with all your heart, about, first, a
disastrous attempt of Russian Pacific Squadron to break out of the blocked by
Japanese Navy Port Arthur, with the death of Admiral Vitgeft
(Withoft) and effective loss of the squadron of 6 battleships as a combat
formation in a show of a decisive advantage of Japanese gunnery and seamanship.
But if that is not bad enough, enter Battle
of Tsushima. In unprecedented in modern history battle, Japanese Navy's
Admiral Togo and his squadron, at the loss of three small torpedo boats (total
450 tons of displacement) annihilated Admiral Zinovy Rozhestvensky's 2nd
Pacific Squadron (combined 127, 000 tons of displacement sunk) in the most
lopsided naval battle in history. No matter how one interprets this—there is
absolutely no other way around it, Japan triumphed on unprecedented scale. Even
Western World was sent into shock by this development. What was happening in
Russia? Do you have an idea? Can you imagine what was happening? Remember Grand
Duke Konstantine's bitter admission after conclusion of the Crimean War?
We
cannot deceive ourselves any longer; we must say that we are both weaker and
poorer than the first-class powers, and furthermore poorer not only in material
terms but in mental resources, especially in matters of administration.
This time, 50 years
later, it was Asian power which bested Russia. Now, if you were what I suggested you to imagine in the beginning--would you ask the question why all this happened to you personally and the country as a whole? Yes, yes, we all know that all
kinds of Russian faux "patriots", such as Solzhenitsyn, complained
that Russia sent not the best troops to fight at the Far East, yes, the
half-world around of Rozhestvensky squadron's voyage was perilous and difficult,
but have Mr. Solzhenitsyn heard (after all he was presented in the West as
Russia's "historian") about this slight "problem" of
Russian shells not exploding even when they were hitting Togo's ships at
Tsushima? Have he ever elaborated on the issue of substandard powder and, in
the end, for some reason higher humidity under which it was stored which had a
disastrous effect on Russian guns? Why Stessel literally sold Port-Arthur to Japanese and instead of being shot as a traitor was pardoned by Nicholas II? Nah, details, tactics, operational art, strategy,
industries—it is all for losers. Yet, if even the Western World was shocked, in
Russia, outcome of Tsushima and of the whole war created a state of utter
national agony. NO lessons have been learned since Crimea and even formal
"liberation" of serfs, in reality did little to improve (in many
cases it made it even more difficult), didn't help much in Russia's quest to
stay a premier power of the age. So, enter first Russian Revolution of
1905-1907. Catastrophic national humiliation in Russo-Japanese War was one of
the major factors, in fact—a match which lit already heating up powder keg of
Russia's problems. Word Tsushima entered Russian consciousness and culture,
till this day, as a euphemism for catastrophe Were Jews involved in this
Revolution? Yes, they were, but they were just one "problem". The most
important one, which also allowed many competent Russian historians (such as
Elena Prudnikova, among others) call this Revolution a first Peasant Revolution
of Russia, was, in the words of a very prominent, fervently anti-Bolshevik,
Russian politician, Pavel Milyukov a failure of "emancipation",
courtesy of Russian, oh, so admired, landowners class, which made famine a normal
state of Russia:
“The insufficiency of food is thus …
associated with an abundance of working power. To find additional food and to
spend additional work in producing it, two methods are possible: either to
increase the productivity of the given plot, or to increase the plot itself.
But the productivity of the soil cannot be increased without new investment of
capital, if even we admit, what many writers do not grant, that such increase
is possible at all on lands in communal ownership and in precarious possession
of the single cultivator. Now the peasant in distress does not possess any
capital, and rural credit for improving land does not exist in Russia. The
other, and, under existing conditions, the only possible, method, is to buy or
rent additional plots of land. This has always been the most ardent desire of
the peasants, and a real struggle for buying or renting land has been going on
during the whole period under consideration. Owing to the large number of
estates of nobles offered for sale, and also to the material help of the
Peasants' Bank (since 1883), the agriculturists have succeeded in increasing
the property of the peasant communes since 1875 by 10 per cent. But even though
we add such land as has been purchased by individual peasants, independently of
the communal allotments, which would increase the amount by another 13 per
cent., this general increase of 23 per cent does not prove equal to the
increase of the peasant population during the same period, which was 48 per
cent, or more than double. As a result, the holdings have constantly decreased
and it became necessary to rent neighboring land. This necessity has been so
great, and opportunities for renting land have been so comparatively few, that
rent has risen enormously. Contrary to the laws of classical economy, the rent
has not only reached the amount of the "unearned increment," but has
far exceeded it, swallowing up the profits and, very often, the very wages of
the tenants. Such exorbitant rent may be compared to what is known to have been
the case in Ireland before the great famine of 1846-47, when the competition
among the tenants "reminded one of a struggle for food in a besieged city
or on a ship in open sea." The same kind of competition is going on among
the Russian peasants owing to the absolute insufficiency of their plots for
mere subsistence. Of course, no profits are looked for from such renting, the
only aim of the peasants--and the only economic explanation of the possibility
of such a rent--being to apply their own and their horses' gratuitous labor to
produce some more grain for their sustenance. Otherwise this possibility of
subsidiary work would be lost, and both man and horse must starve. No wonder
that they count their work as nothing.”
Russia and
Its Crisis
by Paul Mileiiukov, Crane
Lectures for 1903, Chicago, the University of Chicago Press, London T.
Fisher Unwin, Paternoster Square 1905, pages 450-451.
What is interesting in
all that is the fact that still by 1905 a dominant Russian way of agriculture
was a Three-Field
System—a medieval way of growing food stuff, especially in the age of
serious mechanization unfolding in the West. So, it matters really that Russia
was not just humiliated militarily and politically in 1905. It matters that she
was humiliated while being illiterate and constantly hungry, with wholesale and
local famines being a permanent occurrence in Russian countryside. In the end,
overwhelming majority of Russian Army and Navy recruits tasted the meat for the
first time in their life on the military service. As Nikolai Nekrasov wrote in
his 1864 "Grandfather
Frost the Red Nose" (in Russian), Part: Death of a Peasant:
На
эти рыданья и стоны Соседи валили гурьбой: Свечу положив у иконы, Творили
земные поклоны И шли молчаливо домой. На смену входили другие. Но вот уж толпа
разбрелась, Поужинать сели родные — Капуста да с хлебушком квас.
I am not in the position
to translate one of the greatest Russian poets but highlighted reads:
The
Dears sat for the dinner—cabbage, bread and kvas.
But never mind, those
were "enemies" of Russia, who "lied" about the state
Russian people were forced into by all those magnificent Russian nobles who
knew from the get go that it was "Jewish conspiracy" to expose Russia's
peasantry calorie intake and then try to stop never-ending Russian hunger.
Other than that, life in St. Petersburg or in vast landowners' mansions in
country side was swell and champagne was flowing, under the sound of a crunch of French
baguette…
To Be Continued….
