... to repeat it. Here is Vladimir Putin himself today: We are not going to retreat, and we will accept only those proposals which guarantee Russia's security for a historic perspective (duration).
Here is my video on this and other issues.
Thursday, March 6, 2025
"Innocence Lost?"
France had one to lose it? First time I hear about it. This is Liberation yesterday ejaculating after Macron's "grandiose" speech about "countering Russian threat".
But if France insists, it too can disappear, really fast, instead of protracted suicide which should dispose of France as a unified country and nation somewhere by 2050 (give and take). I speak about it in my today's video.
US Former "Intelligence" ...
... officials who wouldn't know shit from shinola.
With Trump and his deputies echoing some of Russia’s talking points about the Ukraine war and indicating they hope to expand U.S. relations with Moscow, former intelligence officials say the administration may even share some sensitive information with Moscow. Several former U.S. intelligence officers said they and their colleagues still in government are deeply concerned about the possible implications of the administration’s shift toward Russia, in which Moscow may no longer be treated as an adversary. “People are very worried,” a former intelligence official said.
As always, there are no names of those "officials", because the only thing those "officials" can do is to fail at their intelligence tasks, among which is the proper assessment of the world outside. And yes, they should worry, especially if they have been associated with DNC and subversion of the US Constitution--the only thing they are capable of. I am not exaggerating--the so called American "expertise" in critical aspects of the global balance of power and practical geopolitics is laughable. In this sense the post-Cold War 1.0 US approach to "intelligence" has very little to do with real intelligence and its main task of collecting information and analyzing it to turn it into knowledge. Forget about it--we are seeing in the so called "intelligence" and "expert" community same ol' Mencken's "Morons with Ph.Ds", or collection of credentialed cretins.
In other "news", people ask me (yes, they send messages all the time), whenever hearing any kind of ambiguous statements from some Russian officials (such as Russia's Ambassador to the UK), if some or the other phrase or word are indications of Russians "surrendering" or compromising. I can only repeat same thing--SMO continues, there will be no "freezing" and there will be no "peacekeepers". Here is Lavrov himself (during pressy with Zimbabwe's FM today) explaining, yet again--in Russian only, sadly--that all this talk is just BS.
I cannot repeat this constantly, but it seems that I must.
Wednesday, March 5, 2025
This Is Critical Admission.
Of what many still cannot wrap their brains around. No, not the "stalemate" (there is no stalemate) but that SMO is a war between the US and Russia.
This is not some "analyst" from some BS think-tank who says this, this is Marco Rubio--no matter how we dislike him--and he is a TOP American diplomat, Secretary of the State. Will wait and see if the ISR was turned off for 404 for real--but if true, this is really big.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)