... to 404 and already have been thinking about boasting how they led the offensive which would defeat those backward Russkies. Well, the problem, of course, was that they still thought that US Army Manuals apply for 404 as well as they did in Gulf War. Boy, did they miscalculate. Some interesting points from Marat on Chasov Yar, which only confirm the point I make that no US general can command anything larger than regiment in SMO. They simply have neither knowledge nor experience.
К осени прошлого года «Хортица», которая на конец 22-го считалась
самым крупным войсковым соединением в числе 4-х основных соединений ВСУ
(240-260 тысяч человек), только за один год потеряла 150 тысяч. В
результате все основные подразделения, я подчеркну, лучшие, что остались
у «Хортицы» сейчас, сконцентрированные для обороны Часов Яра — по
одному, а большинство по два раза уже полностью прошли переформирование.
То есть были один или два раза полностью разбиты. Но давайте посмотрим
на них повнимательнее, так как это само по себе очень интересно. На
первом месте стоит опорная и наиболее боеспособная 93 бригада «Холодный
Яр». По численности почти дивизия. За два года была дважды разбита.
Интересно, что «Холодные» считались наиболее боеспособными, потому
что воевали в основном на лучшей трофейной российской технике. Это
прежде всего танки Т-72, Т-80 и даже считанные Т-90. А так же лучшее,
что было у укропов — Т-64 «Булат». «Холодные» являлись любимцами амеров,
и, например, в ходе осенне-летней кампании 22-го года некоторыми
подразделениями прямо руководили американские офицеры. Правда, когда
началась Артемовская мясорубка быстро сбежали. На втором месте идет 46
аэромобильная (десантная) бригада, подготовленная англичанами в Англии,
самая, кстати говоря, непотрепанная — всего один раз была на
переформировании. Далее 92 десантно-штурмовая бригада (дважды
уничтоженная). Эти вообще смертники. Вроде 110 бригады ВСУ под
Авдеевкой. Отличились тем, что устроили резню наших пленных вместе с
батальоном «Кракен» в селе Новоселовское под Сватово осенью 22-го. Тогда
мученической смертью погибли 16 бойцов Луганского ополчения (ныне той
самой 4-й бригады). Им надели на голову пакеты и удушили. Ой, что будет,
когда луганцы доберутся до 92-х.
Translation: By the fall of last year, Khortitsa, which at the end of the 2022 was considered the largest military formation among the 4 main formations of the Ukrainian Armed Forces (240-260 thousand people), lost 150 thousand in just one year. As a result, all the main units, I emphasize, the best that remain at Khortytsya now, concentrated for the defense of Chasov Yar - one at a time, and the majority have already been completely reorganized twice. That is, they were completely destroyed once or twice. But let's take a closer look at them, as this in itself is very interesting. In first place is the supporting and most combat-ready 93rd brigade “Kholodny Yar”. Almost a division in numbers. In two years it was destroyed twice.
It is interesting that the “Kholodnye” were considered the most combat-ready, because they fought mainly with the best captured Russian equipment. These are primarily T-72, T-80 and even a few T-90 tanks. And also the best thing the Ukrops had - the T-64 Bulat. The “Kholodnye” were the favorites of the Americans, and, for example, during the autumn-summer campaign of 22, some units were directly led by American officers. True, when the Artyomovskaya meat grinder began, they quickly fled. In second place is the 46th airmobile (airborne) brigade, trained by the British in England, which, by the way, is the most unshabby - it was only reformed once. Next is the 92nd Air Assault Brigade (twice destroyed). These are generally suicide troops. Like the 110th brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces near Avdeevka. They distinguished themselves by carrying out a massacre of our prisoners together with the Kraken battalion in the village of Novoselovskoye near Svatovo in the fall of the 22nd. Then 16 fighters of the Lugansk militia (now the same 4th brigade) died as martyrs. They put bags over their heads and suffocated them. Oh, what will happen when the Luhansk people reach 92nd.
Oh, we know what's gonna happen and it better be done without any phones around. Sadism towards POWs was "trained" by NATO instructors and this is the only thing they are good at. Recall how US media have been ejaculating in mid 2010s from describing H.R. McMaster who became, for a short while, the National Security Adviser to Trump. What many forgot that at some point there was a description of how McMaster's regiment treated Iraqi Army POWs--inhumanely. Remarkably, the piece was in one of the major US outlets--either New Yorker or NYT, one of those. Now I cannot find it. I tried, maybe you can. But this is the type of the "training", which is based on killing a third rate force which cannot shoot back and is demolished by the way of total air superiority. But McMaster's "story" and PR around his exploits in Iraq are totally inapplicable to the realities of modern war with "peer" or "better than peer", and that is what those American unit commanders learned really fast. Hence, they fled--very little glory in being evaporated by Tornado's salvo or being blown to smithereens by 152-mm shell or 3M14 Kalibr.
Remember a pathetic piece by WSJ in 2017 titled...
So, yes, they compared (Nemesis, LOL) Chief of the General Staff of Russian Armed Forces to a guy who commanded a... regiment in Iraq. I reacted already then:
Really?
No, I really mean, really? How trivial and shallow one has to be when
coming up, for starters, with such sappy baloney as "nemesis". Nemesis,
if to follow popular Greek Mythology derived definition, is something a
person can not overcome. The immediate question is, then, this--in what
sense Russia's Chief Of General Staff Army General Valery Gerasimov is a "long-time nemesis" for US National Security Adviser General McMaster? How, in what inflamed fantasy, can Valery Gerasimov, who, throughout his career, commanded both 58th Army and then what would amount to several Army Groups, before becoming Chief Of General Staff, be a nemesis to a man, with all due respect to McMaster, whose "accomplishments" involve such things as, even if viewed briefly from Wiki:
Apart from obvious gross mismatch in rank, command, responsibilities and accomplishments--Gerasimov's level is a level of the Chairman Of The Joint Chiefs Of Staff--one is forced to ask the question: and what are those "military thinking" accomplishments of McMaster per him being a Director, Concept Development
and Experimentation? Almost ten years passed from the moment of McMaster's involvement with US doctrine. And what are the results?
It was a grotesque level of arrogance, ignorance and military illiteracy by the whole US military-propaganda establishment. And then they fled--no glory, I guess. But with such "thinkers" as McMaster, we may see yet another glorious US operational "planning" which will kill even more Ukrainians, who US military views merely as a cannon fodder of untermenschen. Hm, where did I see this before? You gotta love internet, it saves so much...
.jpg)