I Do Not Blame People ...

 ... but sometimes I have to be hard on them because after 4 years people should have learned. So, I get today such comment to my video.

Military Summary said that yesterday that the Russians army were cut off of Starlink and the military is having trouble communicating to their commanders and they invaded Ukrainian Army part of what Russia 🇷🇺 had taken back. Andrei have you heard this and is it true? This was yesterday on Military Summary channel YouTube.

And people honestly want to know the answer most of the time. So, I will start from afar:

1. 90%+ of "military experts" on YouTube are pseudo-military frauds with zero military academic, command and tactical-operational experience. Most of these people they browse "Russian" TG channels by all kinds of same frauds as they are: Rybar, Poldolyaka et all, most of them being nothing but heralds of 404 propaganda and know NOTHING about issues of C4ISR--zero, zilch. And they sell it to unsuspecting people as "insights" and "expertise". Now to substance.

2. Russian Armed Forces while utilizing Starlink DO NOT depend on it whatsoever. Russian Armed Forces always had and have continuously expanding communications networks which are:

a) Protected;

b) High speed, albeit not as fast as Starlink internet but more than enough for effective Command and Control of Russian Armed Forces;

c) Including clandestine and high stability comm networks;

3. Since Soviet times, Russians have been present in space-based comms, including civilian, first in the world, TV satellite network Orbita, and even utilizing space comms and their receivers (Shluz) for work with space based navigation systems such as Parus/Cicada. Hm, how do I know this? Maybe because that is my degree and service experience?

4. But now, most important. Here are some older news, about Gonetz/Skif programs. From Reshetnev Corp in 2024.

The document, among other things, provides for development of domestic satellite groupings to provide high-quality, modern and competitive communication services throughout Russia, providing technological sovereignty of the country and the elimination of digital inequality. So, in particular, in As part of the strategy, in the next decade, it is planned to launch 28 Gonets-M1 satellites, 12 Skif satellites, 264 Marathon IoT devices and four Express-RV satellites into orbit. In addition, it will be updated orbital constellation of satellites of the Russian Federation on geostationary orbits: 19 spacecraft will be created and launched, the text of the document says. Also, by 2035, 98% of Russian Internet users should get the ability to network connection with a speed of 1 Gbps or more, and access to 5G on domestic communication equipment should appear in all cities of the country with population over 100 thousand people. Among other tasks is to achieve an increase in capacity of trunk lines for cross-border data transmission by 4.5 times, complete abandonment of 3G (by 2027), average mobile internet speed up to 125 Mbps, etc. Earlier, Yuri Borisov in an interview with Pro Cosmos said, that the creation of multi-satellite constellations is the main priority not only in the Russian Federation, but all over the world. Therefore, now Our country is focused on translating the main satellite-building assets for serial production. If today domestic enterprises can produceabout 40 satellites a year, then by 2026 it is necessary to bring this the figure is up to 250 devices annually.

Well, guess what? Those sats now ARE in serial production but most importantly, for anyone who still didn't get the message--that means that Russian military already operates this capability and, just two days ago, again: 

From the Plesetsk cosmodrome in the Arkhangelsk region, the Soyuz-2.1b launch vehicle with spacecraft was successfully launched in the interests of the Russian Ministry of Defense. The start took place on February 5 at 21:59 Moscow time, the department said. The launch of the launch vehicle and the insertion of spacecraft into the calculated orbit took place in the normal mode, indicated in the publication. The launch of the medium-class launch vehicle was carried out by the combat crew of the Space Forces of the Aerospace Forces. After the launch, the flight was controlled by ground facilities of the automated complex of the German Titov Main Test Space Center. A stable telemetry connection has been established with them. All onboard systems, according to the military department, are functioning normally, in normal mode.

And just to explain more--from our friends (operational level officers)--Russian Army if fully netcentric and uses all those Russian military networks and is NOT dependent on anyone. And as if by accident, Voennaya Mysl in its December 2025 issue writes precisely about it:

Operational Provision of Geospatial Information For Ground Forces of Russian Federation Utilizing Mobile Digital Photogrammetric Stations. And guess what--I circled the list of Russia's combat networks in use. 

That's is also communications and they all are Russian-made. In general, the average YT "military expert" will not understand how combat communications networks are built and how Russian Army is the ONLY army in world which conducts massive combined arms war in netcentric paradigm. But, of course, my good friend Lt. Colonel Oleg Shalandin with whom we'll have a podcast next week, and who happened to be not only combat veteran but also communications officer with serious degree precisely in this, these "experts" from You Tube would shit their pants discussing things of REAL war, because they will be immediately exposed as frauds. So, let's leave it at that and for those who still have doubts--Russian military is fully independent of Starlink. It is also the ONLY military in the world which can make Starlink disappear. But let's hope we will not get there. 

Scott Ritter Saying Some Darndest Things.

Obviously YouTube gets its noose tightened because, you know, "free speech" thingy, but Scott says here some really "darndest things". 

And then, of course, when he speaks about loss ratio, it is the whole other story because...

 

... obviously it never was about losses ratio but about "how you feel about it", you know, what they teach you in Ivy League "social" studies. Just ask Brett Velicovich, he surely knows, as, I am sure, Sean Hannity does. I don't even mention here DNC media machine because it employs primarily morons and inbred imbeciles.

Drifting Apart.

The moment I wrote two days ago this: 

What most of German politcos fail to understand, of course, is the fact that Russia is not beholden to Germany or Europe. 

Bang! Germany yesterday made her choice. 

Officials in Moscow have issued a sternly-worded ultimatum to YouTube’s parent company, Google, saying the video streaming site could face restrictions after it took down two channels run by RT’s German-language service. In the statement, released on Wednesday morning, the country’s national media regulator, Roskomnadzor, said that it “demands all restrictions be lifted from the YouTube channels RT DE and Der Fehlende Part (DFP), run by the news outlet RT, as soon as possible.”According to the authorities, failure to do so would be a violation of Russian law and, “for such actions, an internet resource can be designated as breaching fundamental human rights and freedoms,” and can face a formal warning.“In the event that the owner of the platform doesn’t comply with the warning, legislation allows us to take measures including completely or partially blocking access to it,” Roskomnadzor added.

I don't know if Germany was forced to do this or not for sure, but I do lean toward the theory that the new incoming powers that be in Germany did it on their own accord, plus do not forget that any European "left" today is anti-Russian by definition for a number of ideological reasons, and when ideology, Atlanticist and globalist one in this case,  is involved one cannot expect rational behavior from those who follow it. As I already stated many times the paths of Russia and combined West are diverging and this process is going to accelerate. In some sense I am glad that Germany's political class and Germany's mostly Goebbelsonean-style media  finally "came out" and that makes many things clearer. 

 

Rostislav Ischenko today came out with a "let me make historic parallels" article, which I have a number of legitimate professional questions to, but describing this Germany's snafu with RT and trying to predict the possible outcome, which will be a further deterioration of relations, which are now going into the open confrontation, he concludes: 

Россия, конечно, в случае обострения тоже потеряет, и немало. Но это будут потери денег и времени — замедлится развитие. Бутерброд придется есть не с черной, а с красной икрой. У Запада же есть хороший шанс понять, что обозначает словосочетание «лихие девяностые». Как показывает практика и опыт, гибридная война даже менее гуманна, чем обычная. Вроде и линий фронтов нет, и зондеркоманды не зверствуют: не ревут танки, не учиняются ковровые бомбардировки, никого не ведут в Бабий Яр, а на обширных территориях десятки миллионов людей куда-то исчезают вместе с экономикой и даже с цивилизацией.

Читать далее: https://ukraina.ru/opinion/20210929/1032346275.html

Translation: Russia, of course, will also lose in the event of an aggravation, and a lot. But this will be merely a waste of money and time - development will slow down. The sandwich will have to be eaten not with black, but with red caviar. The West, on the other hand, has a good chance to understand what the phrase "dashing nineties" means. As practice and experience show, hybrid warfare is even less humane than conventional war. It seems that there are no front lines, and the Sonderkommando do not commit atrocities: tanks do not roar, carpet bombings are not carried out, no one is led to Babi Yar, and in vast territories tens of millions of people disappear somewhere along with the economy and even with civilization.

I do not believe that Berlin has people who can fully grasp what they did, but when Russia's Foreign Ministry uses the language such as this in its official statement:

Дату реализации плана (не хочется думать, что речь идёт об «Инфобарбаросса»), видимо, подбирали с особым цинизмом, учитывая, что 28 сентября отмечается Международный день всеобщего доступа к информации.

Translation:  The date of the plan's implementation (One doesn't want to think that we are talking about Infobarbarossa), apparently, was chosen with special cynicism, given that September 28 is the International Day of Universal Access to Information.

That is ominous. Read the whole statement (use translator)--I haven't read from ever reserved Russian FM such a tone. A year ago, Lavrov already articulated to EU and Germany her real interests when basically told Germany to make her choices.  Recall that:

Those people in the West who are responsible for foreign policy and do not understand the necessity of mutually respectable conversation--well, we must simply stop for a while to communicate with them. Especially since Ursula von der Leyen states that geopolitical partnership with current Russia's leadership is impossible. If this is the way they want it, so be it. 

And that is the way it will be now. And even a rare lucid moment of departing Frau Kanzlerin when it may have gotten to her what I was writing about from the inception of this blog, among relatively recent: 

I mean Frau Kanzlerin begins to suspect that it is not about Russia or "democracy", it is about devouring Western Europe and putting Germany at the altar of America's desperation to preserve an illusion of own hegemony, for just a little bit longer, as a first sacrificial victim. The rest of Europe will follow. Today she figured it out, sort of...  

This is exactly what is transpiring now and Germany made her choice. Of course, Berlin now denies its role in shutting down RT, but knowing who German "elites" are--I would rather negotiate with Taliban and believe them, than any politican from the West. My impression is that the first thing to go will be Deutsche Welle which carries on a proud tradition of Doctor Goebbels and I think that is who should go first. It is a disgusting outlet of the most primitive Russophobic propaganda and, again, let's not go where Ischenko tries to go in his article. Who cares what the Germany's objective interests were when she made decisions time after time against them for whatever reasons: be that Hitler, be that Wilhelm, or Merkel. What matters is that those decisions were made and, as Ischenko himself admits, Russia can live without Germany, the opposite is not true, however, and it is Germany's choice.  It is 2021, not 1914 or 1941. As I write for years, Russia will settle Germans who will be moving to Russia. In the end, Ischenko's article is titled Germany's Third Fateful Mistake. There are NO new Bismarks in Germany.  

But as I repeat all the time: Russia is not a charity and she is not going to become any time soon, especially for those who obviously continue to think that they are indispensable for Russia. This might have been the case 20 years ago but it is 2021, not 2001 today. Siemens learned this reality the hard way. At this stage, Russia has many big fishes to fry and they are not in Europe. They certainly look genuinely joyful today. 

What is the meaning behind this "fruitful meeting" we will learn later indirectly, but Turkey does move closer to Russia even without the usual media spin. Erdogan is a shrewd politician and knows where the future is.