Kinda Goes Now ...

 ... without a hitch. 

Russian President Vladimir Putin told Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian that Moscow was providing Tehran with necessary assistance in its war with the United States, during talks at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) summit in Kyrgyzstan, Russian state news agency TASS reported on September 1. The meeting showcases the deepening alignment between two heavily sanctioned states, each fighting a war on its own front, as Tehran leans on Moscow for support and both press the case for a world order less dominated by Washington.

No, it is NOT about "heavily sanctioned", Russia doesn't give a fuck about sanctions--the posture which morons from D.C. will not understand--it is about what already is happening and was happening already since the end of 1990s under the aegis of Primakov's Doctrine. Former Foreign Minister, Prime Minister and Director of SVR--yes, that's Primakov's CV--already knew where this whole West thingy was going. Nowhere good. Plus, Russia, as USSR, traditionally had a massive military and economic footprint in Asia. 

After Putin's 2007 Munich speech Primakov's Doctrine was put into overdrive. After 2008 it became absolutely clear what West has become. After that it was just the matter of technique. Here is a demonstration whose immense significance professionals will grasp in no time. 

This is the second serial MC-21 for Aeroflot. As the first one, it will fly for final acceptance tests and will join the fleet. Same goes for IL-114, the first serial being transferred for local airline in Vladivostok. All Russian-made. Now imagine the scale of technological and supply chains. I'll give you a hint--Airbus, which does make excellent aircraft, requires several nations in Europe to cooperate. None of the Airbus planes are French-made, it is made in Europe, which is now being starved for resources. 

In related news:

US/Israeli military is in full disarray and incompetent. In essence it is a logical end for military which built itself on false narrative. 

P.S. Christian nationalists is a wrong term. 

Larry Wilkerson Talked ...

 ... to the right person in Pentagon. 

He talks about this visit in June 2024. 

Obviously USNI headline is somewhat misleading.  

Russian Nuclear Sub, Frigate with Long Range Land Attack Missiles Operating Off East Coast

These are not just land attack missiles which, of course, matter. These are 3M22 Zircons which are carried by Gorshkov-class frigates which matter the most. Of course, they are capable of land attack too. Here is a reminder what Zircon is.

But these are anti-shipping missiles which can penetrate any even super-pooper AD, which the US Navy doesn't have. Actually Zircon's is up to M=10 and the range of 1,500 km. At least somebody understands in Pentagon. 

Some Numbers ...

 ... which are hidden.

This is a "spread" of casualties which one would expect--give and take, I am not suggesting that pastor's numbers are precise--in case of Brigade Combat Team trying to engage in any significant ground combat in Iran within two to four weeks. In other words, it will melt away. The reason is simple--US Army is not equipped (nor is a partner in Dutch Rudder propaganda of Israel's IDF) to deal with actual long-range fires and stand-off weapons due to a perverted view on warfare in general and air-defense in particular. 

This is a result of worshiping fake history and fake leaders. I will remind you, if you forgot: 

The creeping arrogance, the hubris, which would cost the American Army so dearly in Vietnam. Summing up the achievements of his troops in crushing the German counterattack of December 1944, Patton with pardonable pride claims to have “moved farther and faster and engaged more divisions in less time than any other army in the history of the United States—possibly in the history of the world... No country can stand against such an Army.” These memoirs are valuable not least in showing, however unwittingly, that a disastrous presumption of invincibility took root in the ranks of officers who led the American military after World War II.

This is from foreword to Patton's memoir. US Military doesn't learn--that's not me saying it, that's late hater of Russia and falsifier of history Richard Pipes describing what takes place:  

The United States wants to win its wars quickly and with the smallest losses in American lives… Extreme reliance on a technological superiority, characteristic of U.S. warfare, is the obverse side of America’s extreme sensitivity to its own casualties; so is indifference to the casualties inflicted on the enemy ... We have no general staff; we grant no higher degrees in “military science”; and, except for Admiral Mahan, we have produced no strategist of international repute. America has tended to rely on its insularity to protect it from aggressors, and on its unique industrial capacity to help crush its enemies once war was under way. The United States is accustomed to waging wars of its own choosing and on its own terms. It lacks an ingrained strategic tradition. In the words of one historian, Americans tend to view both military strategy and the armed forces as something to be “employed intermittently to destroy occasional and intermittent threats posed by hostile powers. 

Well, yeah. US Navy has (or had recently) an Admiral who graduated with the major in ... English Literature. But then again, Lisa Franchetti, University of Phoenix and shit. So, what happens when your opponent not only fights back tenaciously but outranges you? They call it "asymmetry"--that's the level of military "science" in the US. Nothing good. Well, with the US Secretary of War having his military education lifted from Scofield Bible and Fox News what do you expect? And don't tell me I didn't warn. I did. Now, who will answer not only for the atrocity against people of Iran but for lives of those American kids who died needlessly for a terrorist entity in Levant? 

I Want To Remind You ...

 ... this dialogue (it is dubbed), it is from a legendary Soviet series 17 Instances (Moments) of Spring. It is only 12 minutes long, but in this 12 minutes (apart from the artistic level of the whole 1973 series which is beyond the grasp of Hollywood) it is fully demonstrated the abyss which separates Russians from the Americans in understanding of the war. Even the way it is presented in movies. 

Why do I suggest this segment? Because of that:

This Russian General, Andrei Valerievich Kartapolov, stated yesterday what I was saying for the last 20 years. You don't need to translate this because I speak about it in my latest video which should be up shortly; and Wehrmacht General in the video speaks about it too. But I suggest you read Kartapolov's CV to understand the academic and experience abyss between Russian and US militaries. 

Larry Giving Some Heads Up.

On Neutrality Studies. I concur--Israel is defenseless, so are US assets in the region with only a SINGLE operational tool at the US disposal, traditional at that, bombing. That's it. 

Is there a panic in the White House and Pentagon? You can bet your ass on that. This is the FIRST time when the US met with the opposition which wipes out US operational rear assets and is ready to go into the blow exchange, tit for tat. Not since Vietnam, the US actually finds itself facing the REAL opposition and REAL war. Unlike it is the case in 404 where the US military hides behind the backs of 404 cannon fodder. 

Everybody who is not brainwashed can subscribe to this: 

Yes, you cannot unsee it. I warned about it 9 years ago. 

The US "military supremacy" was a meticulously constructed media fairy tale, which crumbled like a house of cards in 2023 and now we can see it being finished off in the Middle East when the "coming out" happened. 

Lavrov Being ... Well, Lavrov.

 He held a pressy today and talking about France he asked. 

МОСКВА, 26 фев — РИА Новости. Министр иностранных дел Сергей Лавров на пресс-конференции по итогам переговоров в Дохе попросил объяснить заявление президента Франции Эммануэля Макрона о российских активах. "Мы хотим попросить наших французских коллег разъяснить, в каком международном правовом документе разрешается использовать прибыль с того, что ты своровал", — сказал он.

Translation: MOSCOW, 26 Feb — RIA Novosti. At a press conference following the talks in Doha, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov asked for an explanation of French President Emmanuel Macron's statement about Russian assets. "We want to ask our French colleagues to clarify which international legal document allows the use of profits from what you stole," he said.

As you all know, French who for some unknown reason consider themselves a "player" in geopolitics, want to use the profit from Russia's frozen assets to be a part of "peace negotiations". Why Macron and French decided that they will be allowed anywhere near "peace negotiations" remains a complete riddle shrouded in mystery.

Meanwhile, in the news of a butthurt and increasing LOL, they continue to cope)) Look at the dates--they go on, and on, and on, while, unlike F-15 which never encountered any real enemy in the skies or on the ground, Russian Air Force redefined modern air combat and SEAD in REAL combat.

But the BS continues, to paint the picture of utter invincibility of something which never really fought. It is of interest, in this case, to elaborate on Pete Hegseth's totally expected statement to the effect that the US must have the strongest force in the world--he must say things like that. Needless to say, to elaborate on this issue as well as to explain why it is impossible may require a rather thick book, half of which will be bibliography and references, the other half--REAL military history and data related to operations from WW II to today. The US will, of course, remain the strongest Army in Americas and will continue to have a formidable Navy with nuclear deterrent increasingly moving to submarines (granted USS Columbia will come out without already significant troubles).

But other than that, especially considering the experience of the SMO--the largest continental war since 1945--which is already being summarized and generalized, we need to clearly understand that technological dimension of modern war changed so dramatically (in fact--revolutionary way), that, as I state ad nauseam, it is almost impossible to relate the US Armed Force TOE and experiences to it, other than discard wholesale the whole idea behind US military in the XX century. Per XXI century, well ... long long story. Pentagon is not ready for this, but its children will love it (c)