Non-Agreement Capable, Or Agreement Incapable, Or...

Agreement-unworthy, or.... I didn't find many English-language report on Putin's last week interview on this issue:

“You know, Obama is no longer president, but there are certain things we don’t talk about publicly,” Russia’s state-run RIA Novosti news agency quoted Putin as saying to Stone. “In any case, I can say that our agreements reached in [a] telephone conversation were not fulfilled by the American side,” Putin said, declining to go further into details.

We knew this all along, didn't we? It is not just about personalities, however repulsive in his narcissism and lack of statesmanship Obama was. It is systemic, no matter who comes to power to the Oval Office--it will make no difference. No difference, whatsoever. What is known as US power (political) elite has been on the downward spiral for some time and, in some sense, the whole Epstein affair with serious pedophilia charges, not to mention an unspeakable slap on the wrist in which this well-connected pervert was let go ten years ago,  is just one of many indications of a complete moral and cognitive decomposition of this so called "elite" which continues to provide one after another specimens of human depravity. Remarkably, as much as I always feel nauseated when seeing GOPers, it is impossible to hide the fact that Epstein's clients in their majority are mostly associated with putrid creatures from the so called "left", with Bill Clinton featuring prominently in the company of this pervert. 

There were some attempts to even conceive a possibility of somehow "progressives" and "conservatives" getting together in their condemnation of this heinous crime (yeah, yeah, I know, Presumption of Innocence). 

Now back to Epstein. If we learn that he was actually running something called the “Lolita Express,” that would be a signal that prosecutors have a lot of work to do, rounding up the pedophile joyriders. So it was interesting on July 6 to see Christine Pelosi, daughter of the House speaker, posting a stern tweet: “This Epstein case is horrific and the young women deserve justice. It is quite likely that some of our faves are implicated but we must follow the facts and let the chips fall where they may—whether on Republicans or Democrats.” So we can see: the younger Pelosi wants one standard—a standard that applies to all.

Doesn't it sound wonderful, warm and fuzzy, or too good to be true? It sure does, because, as much as most American elite "conservatives" are not really conservatives, what passes as "progressive" in the United States is PRIMARILY based on sexual deviancy, including implicit promotion of pedophilia by "intellectual class",  and "environmental" agenda, period! Everything else is secondary. Those who think that actual conservatism (not a caricature it is known in the United States) has anything to discuss with the so called "progressives"--they unwittingly support this very "progressive" cause which, in its very many manifestations, is a realization of the worst kind of suppression of many millennia old natural, including biological, order of things and, in the end, elimination of normality as such--a future even Orwell would have had difficulty describing. 

Of course, Pinkerton gets some flashes of common sense, when states that:

Most likely, a true solution will have “conservative” elements, as in social and cultural norming, and “liberal” elements, as in higher taxes on city slickers coupled with conscious economic development for the proletarians and for the heartland. Only with these economic and governmental changes can we be sure that it’s possible to have a nice life in Anytown, safely far away from beguiling pleasuredomes. 

Well, he puts it very crudely, but I see where he is at least trying to get it from. I will add, until nation, as in American nation, recognizes itself as a nation, as people who have common history, culture and mission, thus, inevitably producing this aforementioned healthy social and cultural norming--no amount of wishful thinking or social-economic doctrine-mongering will help. There is no United States without European-keen, white Christian, heterosexual folk, both with acutely developed sense of both masculinity and femininity, period. But this is precisely the state of the affairs which American "progressives" are fighting against; this is the state of the affairs which they must destroy be that by imposition of suffocating political correctness, the insanity of multi-gender and LGBT totalitarianism, or by criminal opening of the borders to anyone, who, in the end, will vote for the Democratic Party. You cannot negotiate with such people. In the end, WHO is going to negotiate? A cowardly, utterly corrupt, current GOPers and geriatric remnants of Holy Reaganites? Really? Ask how many of them are Mossad assets and are in the pockets of rich Israeli-firsters and Gulfies? 

True "Left" economics, which seeks more just distribution (not re-distribution) of wealth, based on a fusion of economic models and types of property, cannot exist within cultural liberal paradigm of "privileged" minorities, be them racial or sexual ones, aided by massive grievance-generating machine--it is not going to last. Both economic and social normality can exist ONLY within cohesive nation and that, due to activity on both nominal sides (in reality it is the same) of American political spectrum, has been utterly destroyed. The mechanism of this destruction is rather simple and it comes down, in the end, to the, pardon my French, number of ass-holes populating unit-volume (density, that is) of political space in America. It goes without saying that such a density in the US reached deadly toxic levels, and Russiagate coup, Epstein's Affair, or the parade of POTUSes with the maturity levels of high school kids are just numerous partial manifestations of what one can characterize as the end of the rope. After all, who would be making any agreements with representatives of the system which is rotting and decomposing? 

Paul Craig Roberts penned today a good piece: The Obituary for Western Civilization Can Now be Written. I have to disagree somewhat with PCR's one assertion:

           Europeans Are as Dumbshit as Americans

I would pause a little here. Yes and no. Here is Colonel Wilkerson who talks about both wealth (starts roughly at 14:00) and about other very important strategic and operational fact: overwhelming majority of weapons on hands today are among those who either support Trump openly or simply had it with system in general.

And here is the issue: my bets are on people with military backgrounds, who had first hand experience with military organization (standard manuals, combat manuals et al) and have operational and command experience in their conflict with American Social Justice Warriors (you know--"progressives") and other openly terrorist "progressive" organizations such as Antifa. At least ruined Portland started to do something about it. Is there any real left left in the US? And I don't mean this a-hole Bernie Sanders.

And here is my rephrasing of Tolstoy's conclusion to War and Peace: there are too many ass-holes in American politics today, very many of them being so called "progressives". This number must be reduced by all legal means today, and if American ass-holes can work together terrorizing majority of good, not ass-hole people, what's precluding those good people to work together? Nothing, except for the rotting corpse of GOP which had audacity to call itself "conservative". If not, all is lost and we do not want to live in the world which will come. And the guns will start speaking. 

UPDATE: 07/11/19

Oh goody, do they read me or is it one of those moments when, in Lenin's description of Revolutionary Situation, economic slogans transform into political ones? Evidently Catholic Conservative Michael Warren speaks in unison with Lenin and me, with both me and Warren certainly not being Marxists or "communists". Here is what Warren has to say today:

Whew. Now I get why people become communists. Not the new-wave, gender-fluid, pink-haired Trots, of course. Nor the new far Left, which condemns child predators like Epstein out one side of its mouth while demanding sympathy for pedophiles out the other. No: I mean the old-fashioned, blue-collar, square-jawed Stalinists. I mean the guy with eight fingers and 12 kids who saw photos of the annual Manhattan debutantes’ ball, felt the rumble in his stomach, and figured he may as well eat the rich. Of course, we know where that leads us. For two centuries, conservatives have tried to dampen the passions that led France to cannibalize herself circa 1789. Nevertheless, those passions weren’t illegitimate—they were just misdirected. Only an Englishman like Edmund Burke could have referred to the reign of Louis XIV as “the age of chivalry.” Joseph de Maistre spoke for real French conservatives when he said the decadent, feckless aristocracy deserved to be guillotined. The problem is, Maistre argued, there was no one more suitable to succeed them.

It is a very loaded statement. It is also not an incorrect one. It is also relevant to what I preach for years, decades really, that history of the so called "communism" in USSR was a conservative history--a transition from depravity and corruption of Russian Imperial "elites" to what resulted in the mutated nationalism of sorts in late 1930s and led to the defeat of Nazism, historically unprecedented restoration of the destroyed country and then breaking out into space. But that is a separate story--in USSR, as it is the case in Russia today, sexual perversion and deviancy are not looked at lightly. Nor are, in general, "liberal values" which are precisely designed to end up with the legitimization of pedophilia--a long held, and hidden, desire of Western "elites". Guess why such an obsession with, realistically, literary mediocrity of Nabokov's  Lolita by Western moneyed and "intellectual" class. Who in their own mind, unless one is a forensic psychiatrist or detective, would be interested in such a topic, not to mention writing a book on it, not to mention a variety of Hollywood and, in general, Western cinematography artsy class making scores of Lolita movies? Each time I read Lolita, in both Russian and English, I felt an urgent desire to take a shower after reading this concoction. I guess, I am not "sophisticated" enough to recognize appeals of this type of "art". As Warren notes:

Yes: those passions are legitimate. We should feel contempt for our leaders when we discover that two presidents cavorted with Epstein, almost certainly aware that he preyed on minors. We should feel disgust at the mere possibility that Pope Francis rehabilitated Theodore McCarrick. And we should be furious that these injustices haven’t even come close to being properly redressed. This is how revolutions are born. America is reaching the point where, 200 years ago, a couple French peasants begin eyeing the Bastille. The question is, can conservatives channel that outrage into serious reform before it’s too late? Can we call out the fetid, decadent elites within our own ranks? Are we prepared to hold our own “faves” to account—even Trump himself? Alas, it’s only a matter of time until we find out.

In this, I, essentially an atheist, and a conservative Catholic, are speaking in the same voice. 

Trump Is Not Racist.

I may, and justifiably so, criticize DJT, and there is a lot to be said about his style and world-view, but what Donald J. Trump is not for sure--he is not a racist, he is race realist. As am I, btw. 

Here is yet another belch of CNN on the issue of immigration.

But, whoever this deranged bimbo Navarro is, DJT is absolutely correct when he calls Salvador, let alone Haiti, shitholes--they are shitholes and they will never be anything else. And if this Navarro gal learned a bit about Mexico's immigration laws she would probably shut up about "racism"--the only trick American "progressives" know. Now, one day before mid-terms Democrats, who are responsible for turning the US into the increasingly multicultural cloaca, are desperate to do anything to prevent Trump's GOP retain majority in both houses. 

Republicans are disgusting, at least most of them, but at least they do not want to give up their own country to ethnic mafias immediately and if Navarro disagrees with this policy, she can go back to the shithole she came from to the US--the name of this shithole is Nicaragua and I am sure, political system and people there are not racist. Yeah, right. Navarro can wax moralistic whatever she wants but she lies when she puts on this insulted innocence look for the consumption of CNN audience. She should know, and she has degree in Latin American Studies (whatever that is),  that truth is very simple--with or without interference of the US historically, Latin America had never put its act together and for that there are many substantial reasons other than political and economic issues. She may take a look at Brazil, for warm up.

Trump knows, as know I, or anyone who doesn't drink "progressive" Kool Aid--no white christian America, no United States of America, which, for all its faults, has a lot of good in it still left too. Multicultural societies DO NOT work without core cohesive nation, otherwise--civil war and violent disintegration follow. For Navarro, who comes from Latin American background, term Balkanization means absolutely nothing, because she thinks that Latinization of the United States will be just dandy and all those "racists" (like Trump) will be driven out of power. Well, with that the ideology of political correctness, which forbids to call shitholes what they are, or which forbids viewing racial distribution and proportionality of violent crimes as FBI presents, or which forbids calling a spade a spade, will reign supreme, as it begins to happen now. I have some news for Navarro--Blacks in US do not really want to integrate, nor huge swaths of Latino population really care that much about integration (granted, they do still better than blacks)--this all precisely for the reasons of being "racist" but, somehow, nobody calls them that at CNN. So, whenever white person points out to his (her) own rights--it is racist, when blacks or Latinos want to reshape the United States in their own image which, frankly, is the end of the United States, it is OK. But it is not.

I also have some news for Navarro--nations are defined, among few prime things, also with their national borders which MUST be protected. So the march of this migrant "caravan"--an obvious dangerous provocation concocted in the inflamed minds of American "progressives" threatens to unleash an extremely damaging forces within the US. I said it many times before, I'll repeat it again--while GOP is the party of old money and is filled with scumbags (such as Navarro--a GOP "strategist"), who will wreak the country eventually anyway, they are still less dangerous in a short run than Democratic party and its "progressive" wing which has nothing, zero, to do with American Old Left. It is this party which sees NO value in America's white culture and history and it is this party which is plotting a violent demise of America by turning it into the battlefield of racial groups, with eventual clean up of white culture from the map and memory of a shithole which will emerge under the tutelage of new US. This is racist and it is also extremely dangerous but it is difficult to explain this to such ignorant bimbo as Navarro.  After all, why the man with intelligence on the orders of magnitude more powerful than Navarro's and who is absolutely NOT a "racists" speaks about the fate of white Christian America. 

UPDATE: Ahhh, things getting slightly clearer. Here is the deal:

New 'The View' Co-Host Has Been Announced

So, a collection of ignorant under-educated gals with zero skills who provide "social (or political) commentary". Sure, as much as Trump is headless, what's the difference when he is discussed by other unhinged and headless people. Boy, talk about lose-lose situation. Yep, Ana Navarro will be "commenting" there, I assume as "conservative", that is Latino open borders "conservative", which is not really a conservative or whatever other monikers are used nowadays in a confused and chaotic American "political commentary" universe. Sheer mad house.

It Is Really Not A Good Day.

I will abstain from commenting on the horror in Las Vegas, I will just say that I feel sorry for people and my thoughts are with innocents, alive and those, sadly, dead.  But what I will comment on, though, is this: American (or US-associated) celebrities--just shut up. You ignorant, uneducated (look at Clooney's or Damon's academic records, not to speak of this no good bimbo Rhianna) no good pretentious dweebs--put a cork in it about guns. Lose your bodyguards and go preach to South Chicago or Detroit, see what happens next. Nobody gives a shit about your "opinions"--you are freaking entertainers who fake human emotions to get paid, that's the range and scope of your competencies.  All this "progressive" cabal is disgusting. This, however, is below anything. 

CBS fires vice president who said Vegas victims didn't deserve sympathy because country music fans 'often are Republican'

But in a stream of a bad news today came this, another sad one: 

Tom Petty just died, only 66. Man, talk about really bad day...