Alex Jones Is Not Wrong On This One.

Yes, there was a rally in Richmond, VA in defense of the 2nd Amendment. I am with rallying guys, law abiding citizens have ALL rights for defense of personal safety and property. It is one of those purely American things which sets the United States apart and is attractive to very many people around the globe. 

Thousands of people entered the security perimeter around the state capitol, where Northam had banned guns in an executive order, fearing violence. But thousands of others rallied on nearby streets that didn’t fall under the emergency order, many of them carrying assault rifles and wearing tactical gear. Members of the Three Percenter and Oath Keepers militias marched in the streets with their weapons, while other rally-goers cheered one man carrying a large sniper rifle with an orange “Guns Save Lives” sticker affixed to its magazine... Far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones cruised the streets of Richmond with a megaphone and an armored truck. Shouting from his vehicle, deemed his “battle tank,” the radio host reportedly declared: “We are here in Virginia at the capital in defiance of the globalist tyranny and their attempts to trigger a civil war.”

I agree with Alex on this one: while both US nominal "parties" are globalist, it is Democratic Party which pushes for openly globalist, anti-white, anti-male agenda. Their version of "gun control" is designed to defang any kind of resistance which remaining native (and by native I mean also traditional white Christian America) Americans may mount. Democratic party and their top political operatives are a party of a national treason. They know it, and that is why they are afraid of armed law abiding citizens. As much as GOP is a despicable cesspool of Neo-liberal and neocon creatures, the party, such as Democratic one, which contains internally influential people of a radical and nationally suicidal political views such as AOC or Ilhan Omar can not be viewed other than the Liquidation Commission for the United States. I have issues with such a party.    

Here is just a small part of rally "within" the security perimeter.

UPDATE:


Ahh, "truthful" US media and hysterical Hollywood types (useless freeloaders pretending to be other people):

MSNBC correspondent Gabe Gutierrez found himself in hot water when he tweeted a video of a large group of protesters saying the pledge of allegiance and captioned the video with: “Chants of ‘we will not comply’ from gun rights protesters in Richmond.” Since the audio in the video did not match what Gutierrez was saying, commentators like Ben Shapiro and Dana Loesch immediately descended on the man.

You think anyone will get fired? Nah, masculinity in the US is a forbidden trait.   

MSNBC reporter Ben Collins deleted a tweet where he called the rally a “white nationalist rally.”

Sure he did, there were plenty of hard-working, Second Amendment enthusiasts black folks. So, this thing also didn't work out for race hustlers in US media.  

Russian Geopolitcs In A Nutshell.

As you (at least some of you) may have guessed it--I don't have time for reading and watching all news and reports of the day--it is physically impossible for one person. That is why so many people today are involved, apart from professional intelligence organizations, into all kinds of "analytical" activity which is done on the industrial scale. Obviously, most of such activity is not real analysis but pushing different economic and ideological agendas on unsuspecting public, this is not to mention that it is done by people who, for the most part, have neither serious background nor real qualifications to "analyze" anything, least of all serious geopolitical, military-political and military-technological issues. Yet, once in a while a straight talk from the very top allows to avoid all those tedious analytical discussions and elaborations and get to the bottom of the issue. Here is Vladimir Putin stating obvious to Chinese TV two days ago. 

By sovereignty Putin means exactly what this term stands for. From Merriam-Webster:

  

a : supreme power especially over a body politic b : freedom from external control : autonomy c : controlling influence     

That, obviously, goes completely against everything globalist Washington's swamp stands for. But no "analysis" of any kind is needed here. This also makes Russia both an object of fanatical hatred of globalist "elites" who, for obvious reasons of not being very bright, decided that everything in life is measured in money. It is not and historical nations who survived calamities unknown to Wall Street shysters and their political servants, and did it for much longer than the United States existed, seem to be waking up. Nation-state was, is and will remain a decisive player of geopolitics and this cannot be changed. Russia's sovereignty, meanwhile, is an enormously attractive concept for very many, no matter how much (pseudo)statistical fraud many pollster organizations unload on public. The process, which the United States initiated  in 2014 cannot be stopped anymore. Slowed down a bit? Possible. But not stopped. 

But the conventional wisdom states that sand castles do not last. This will help us understand why the whole gigantic blunder in Ukraine will have, and is already having, huge ramifications for the United States....