... all journos should be handled. Thomas Massie just gave some example:
I was writing about it for a long time. Yes, this is an acrobatic ad hominem. Here is one my note on that from three years ago.
And that's the point I make for years--one cannot continue to merely challenge the BS fountaining from the deep recesses of US "academia" and think-tankdom, one has to challenge qualifications, that is to say start operating in the ad hominem mode, when dealing with a cabal of uncultured, unread, illiterate Ph.D shysters who toil for the benefit of America's homicidal foreign policy and military adventurism.
I use this myself, but Massie took it even further--so, when communicating with some scumbag from BBC or CNN you should always ask them questions like that: how many pedophiles do you have in you staff, or--I heard you abuse your husband (wife). The best is to ask Ben Shapiro if he is angry because, I heard, he has a child's penis? That's how it should be handled. Those people are not normal humans--they are sociopaths with no morality or even basic understanding of right from wrong. And you cannot reason with them.
