Well, No.

Or rather--it all depends. Uncertainty and the task of resolving it in weapon systems is one thing, for that one needs a serious STEM background (engineering, usually) and modern computation and signal processing. But this kind of "uncertainty"...

A frustrated President Volodymyr Zelensky launched a furious broadside against Ukraine's NATO allies Tuesday as they began a summit still unsure how to advance Kyiv's membership bid. Zelensky, who will come to Vilnius during the two-day summit, denounced as "absurd" the reluctance of some NATO leaders to provide a clear timetable for Ukraine to join the alliance. "Uncertainty is weakness. And I will openly discuss this at the summit," Zelensky tweeted. The alliance backs Ukraine in its battle against Russia's 16-month-old invasion, but several members — notably US President Joe Biden — oppose giving Ukraine a timetable for membership.

... actually is very "certain". In fact, there is no uncertainty here whatsoever, while weakness was there (still is) from the get go. Same goes for NATO "support" for 404 because here basic math and physics play role and the US simply doesn't want those pictures of burning Abrams tanks and shot down F-16, F-15, F-35 et al being demonstrated for the whole world to see. Simple as that. You see, no uncertainty. 

Now about this:

Arriving at the talks, President Emmanuel Macron said France would join Britain in supplying long-range cruise missiles to allow Ukraine to strike Russian targets in depth.

Now, I think it might be the time for Russia to look attentively at France and her assets as potential targets. What is it going to be? I am sure General Staff has ideas. The best way to deal with hysterical chihuahua is to kick it under the couch. But, in general, the first day of NATO "summit" confirmed that NATO "doesn't want", a euphemism for being scared shitless, the war with Russia. NATO simply has no real resources for that. Russia does and that makes all the difference. Per NATO ramping anything up--wet dreams, once one considers the state of economy of combined West. 

Meanwhile, the old fool is still around:

Veteran US statesman Henry Kissinger said he wouldn’t criticize Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky for blowing up the Nord Stream pipelines, according to a video published by a pair of Russian pranksters. The centenarian thought he was talking to the Ukrainian leader himself. The duo, who go by stage names Vovan and Lexus, posed as the Ukrainian leader during a video conference with Kissinger, they claimed on Monday. A full hour-long episode of their show, which was based on the prank, was released on social media the next day. According to one of the shown clips, at one point they asked Kissinger whether he believed Moscow blew up its own undersea energy links with Germany last September. At first the centennial former US official seemed hesitant to respond, but the fake Zelensky insisted. “I, frankly, have thought it was you,” Kissinger finally said, according to the dubbed over translation of the exchange.

This relic passes in the West for the wise statesman. Everything you need to know...