Reminiscence of the Future...

Si Vis Pacem, Para Vinum © Andrei Martyanov's Blog

Tuesday, August 8, 2017

Daniel Larison Delivers, Almost.

Daniel Larison is not going to publish my comments to his articles--and that is OK--I understand an emotional struggle of the person and American patriot when faced with the fact that US foreign, so called, "policy" does not exist as a coherent and competent set of objectives. Or that the US foreign policy establishment is mostly a bunch of badly educated (not to be mistaken with "degrees") hacks--nobody is going to like that, especially coming from some Russian dude. Yet, today, on the 9th anniversary of Russo-Georgian War of 08-08-08, he definitely almost nailed it in appropriate tone and substance. 

Will Ruger noticed that Pence repeated the pledge to bring Georgia into NATO during his visit there last week:
Pence stated, “President Trump and the United States stand firmly behind the 2008 NATO Bucharest statement which made it clear that Georgia will, someday, become a member.”
Since this week marks the ninth anniversary of the August 2008 war, it is worth remembering that the commitment made at the Bucharest summit earlier that year significantly added to the tensions between Russia and Georgia. If it had been up to George W. Bush, Georgia and Ukraine would have both received Membership Action Plans, but even the promise of future membership was dangerously provocative. Promising that Georgia would one day become a member of the alliance alarmed Moscow and gave false encouragement to the Georgian government.
Combined with other expressions of U.S. support for Georgia during the Bush years, this commitment by the alliance led then-President Saakashvili to believe that the U.S. and other Western powers would come to Georgia’s aid in the event of a conflict. He recklessly escalated the low-level conflict in South Ossetia and triggered a war with Russia by shelling Tskhinvali, where Russian troops were stationed in a supposed “peacekeeping” role. That attack provided Russia with the pretext to invade. The rhetorical support for Georgia proved to be meaningless, and the war drove home how big of a liability Georgia would be as an ally.
As a result of the war, Russia recognized the independence of both South Ossetia and Abkhazia, thus making their reintegration into Georgia much less likely than it was before the war. If Georgia’s NATO aspirations were fanciful before the 2008 war, they became preposterous after it. Reviving talk of Georgia’s future NATO membership today is irresponsible and dangerous. It is also cruel to keep giving Georgia more false encouragement that it will be able to join the alliance at some point. It isn’t going to happen, and it does no one any good to keep pretending otherwise.
This is also how American foreign policy real realism should sound (or read). Even if to discount a jab at real Russian peacekeepers in South Ossetia--once one remembers what Georgians did to Ossetians in 1991-92, including ethnic cleansing--one will lose any desire for trying to be "cute" or be a "supposed expert". But as it is, this piece is good enough, especially in pointing out a huge role the US played in unleashing that war (have this war had anything to do with John "We are all Georgians now" McCain's campaign of 2008? Wink-wink)--the fact long ago denied by "establishment". E.g. Condi Rice, in fact, insisted that she warned Saakashvili not to make any stupid moves. 

But that war had other huge meaning--it showed how serious combined arms operations never went away, it also gave some glimpse of Russia's military might which simply, for all problems of Russian Armed Forces then, obliterated Georgian Army in less than 5 days. It also drew the first red line for the US and many didn't like it--the countdown to a massive global power re-balancing began then. Well, to be more precise, from Putin's Munich speech, but close enough--two events are actually closely related. 
Posted by smoothiex12 at 12:39 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: anniversary., Daniel Larison, Russo-Georgian War of 2008, South Ossetia
Newer Post Older Post Home
View mobile version
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Buy Me A Coffee (or Jack).

Buy me a coffee

Support me.

Become a Patron!

For A Nice Shot Of Bourbon And A Good Cigar

For A Nice Shot Of Bourbon And A Good Cigar

America's Final War

America's Final War
Now It Is official

It is here.

It is here.

Real Revolution In Military Affairs

Real Revolution In Military Affairs
It Is Here

Pepe Escobar About Revolution.

Once in a blue moon an indispensable book comes out making a clear case for sanity in what is now a post-MAD world. That’s the responsibility carried by “The (Real) Revolution in Military Affairs,” by Andrei Martyanov (Clarity Press), arguably the most important book of 2019.


My Book Is On Sale

My Book Is On Sale
It Is Here

Saker's Review.

Saker's Review.
The above summary does not do justice to Martyanov’s truly seminal book. I can only say that I consider this book as an absolutely indispensable “must read” for every person in the USA who loves his/her country and for every person who believes that wars, especially nuclear ones, must be avoided at all costs.

Asia Times About The Book

Asia Times About The Book
In Losing Military Supremacy, his latest, groundbreaking book, crack Russian military-naval analyst Andrei Martyanov deconstructs in detail how, “the United States faces two nuclear and industrial superpowers, one of which fields a world-class armed forces. If the military-political, as opposed to merely economic, alliance between Russia and China is ever formalized – this will spell the final doom for the United States as a global power.”

My Blog List

  • Daniel Larison at Responsible Statecraft
  • Global South
  • Kunstler
  • A Son of the New American Revolution
  • Mike Norman Economics
  • The New Kremlin Stooge
  • Five Guns West
  • Russia Observer
  • ROCK SOLID POLITICS
  • Scott Ritter Extra
  • Moon of Alabama
  • The Vineyard of the Saker
Show 10 Show All

Russia's Navy In Search Of A Mission

Russia's Navy In Search Of A Mission
My article came out in December issue of US Naval Institute Proceedings

About Me

smoothiex12
View my complete profile

Blog Archive

  • ►  2025 (688)
    • ►  July (50)
    • ►  June (116)
    • ►  May (123)
    • ►  April (97)
    • ►  March (100)
    • ►  February (106)
    • ►  January (96)
  • ►  2024 (1146)
    • ►  December (87)
    • ►  November (93)
    • ►  October (106)
    • ►  September (102)
    • ►  August (108)
    • ►  July (103)
    • ►  June (90)
    • ►  May (108)
    • ►  April (86)
    • ►  March (80)
    • ►  February (90)
    • ►  January (93)
  • ►  2023 (912)
    • ►  December (96)
    • ►  November (87)
    • ►  October (97)
    • ►  September (88)
    • ►  August (56)
    • ►  July (75)
    • ►  June (79)
    • ►  May (76)
    • ►  April (68)
    • ►  March (70)
    • ►  February (53)
    • ►  January (67)
  • ►  2022 (737)
    • ►  December (61)
    • ►  November (55)
    • ►  October (60)
    • ►  September (50)
    • ►  August (66)
    • ►  July (65)
    • ►  June (71)
    • ►  May (63)
    • ►  April (70)
    • ►  March (79)
    • ►  February (52)
    • ►  January (45)
  • ►  2021 (382)
    • ►  December (42)
    • ►  November (31)
    • ►  October (38)
    • ►  September (34)
    • ►  August (37)
    • ►  July (34)
    • ►  June (37)
    • ►  May (26)
    • ►  April (28)
    • ►  March (23)
    • ►  February (22)
    • ►  January (30)
  • ►  2020 (385)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (21)
    • ►  October (19)
    • ►  September (23)
    • ►  August (23)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (34)
    • ►  May (36)
    • ►  April (62)
    • ►  March (50)
    • ►  February (34)
    • ►  January (29)
  • ►  2019 (311)
    • ►  December (33)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (30)
    • ►  September (21)
    • ►  August (27)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  June (32)
    • ►  May (31)
    • ►  April (24)
    • ►  March (22)
    • ►  February (21)
    • ►  January (19)
  • ►  2018 (320)
    • ►  December (25)
    • ►  November (29)
    • ►  October (31)
    • ►  September (30)
    • ►  August (31)
    • ►  July (29)
    • ►  June (29)
    • ►  May (19)
    • ►  April (47)
    • ►  March (25)
    • ►  February (14)
    • ►  January (11)
  • ▼  2017 (197)
    • ►  December (24)
    • ►  November (9)
    • ►  October (14)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ▼  August (10)
      • Blank Is...Well, Blank
      • 2017 Military Strength Ranking.
      • Were Yes Prescient? Yes!
      • Just Signed The Contract.
      • Sorry For Slowdown
      • Daniel Larison Delivers, Almost.
      • Why Poland Is In The Dead End Already.
      • American Modern Art At Its Finest.
      • So, Will Donbass Forces Get Iskanders?
      • Don't Thank Congress.
    • ►  July (12)
    • ►  June (26)
    • ►  May (28)
    • ►  April (28)
    • ►  March (11)
    • ►  February (16)
    • ►  January (12)
  • ►  2016 (163)
    • ►  December (13)
    • ►  November (10)
    • ►  October (13)
    • ►  September (12)
    • ►  August (13)
    • ►  July (16)
    • ►  June (11)
    • ►  May (17)
    • ►  April (18)
    • ►  March (15)
    • ►  February (10)
    • ►  January (15)
  • ►  2015 (71)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (4)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  February (12)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2014 (7)
    • ►  December (7)

Traffic

Total Pageviews

79,199,717
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.