... all the time from all "military experts".
Britain’s nuclear submarine fleet ‘no longer fit for purpose’. Former Navy chief calls for ‘radical’ action to revive programme after catastrophic failures.
And if anyone thinks that this could be fixed--I have bad news, not gonna happen. Obviously, for people who still remember halcyon days of the Royal Navy it is a torturous admission. But it is not about just submarine fleet. Get a load this:
By now I do not even bother with "argumentation" of "why"--it is self-evident, as frontline embarrassing failures of Leopards, Challengers, Abrams, what have you demonstrated--one needs a design school based on fighting off the best of the best. NATO became complacent with easy victories over inept Arab militaries operating "monkey models" of Soviet tanks and ignored tactical and operational reality in favor of narratives. Well, there is a reason why Challengers have been withdrawn from the line of combat contact in 404--if not, they all would have been destroyed. Chobham armor--grossly talked up and "admired"--is no contest for modern UAVs, ARGMs and tanks, even T-72 earlier models. This is what happens when people skip lectures on tactics, operations and operational research. Well, you get this clown))
I’m a veteran tank soldier, and I believe there is a way to fix the struggling Ajax
LOL. Let me show a REAL veteran tank commander who also happened to have an engineering degree (not degree in agriculture) and who commanded all of it and won the war against NATO.
Well, I wrote so much about Russia's military education.
No comments:
Post a Comment