This DRG (Diversionary Recon Group) Of NATO...

 ... is a toast now. Artillery (and RUK) is a bitch. 

This is not Hollywood--if you are detected, you have a very few precious seconds to run, if not--152 mm is incoming and then (depending on the range) mortars. Then loitering munitions. These Anglo (one American, few others probably British-Australian) guys have chosen a wrong warrior path. 

Meanwhile...

In a case of sheer military stupidity, khohol drives lonely T-72M with full (and most likely old and susceptible to detonation) Combat Load and encounters, surprise, surprise, a Zala product. The result is dramatic. Russian MoD yesterday gave the number of VSU losses at 6,600 personnel. Today it is highly likely above 7,000 and Pokrovsk drive continues. I talk about it in my today's video.

Another One Bites The Dust...

 ... RUK (Recon-Strike Complex) at work couple of days ago at Kherson axis. 

Three M-270 (with ATACMS or HIMARS) and a lovely secondary detonation of ammo storage. Mr. Iskander is getting now its longer--much-much longer (1000 ++ km) version, just in case. 

Now, I understand that Glenn Diesen worries (rightly so) about possible NATO-Russia clash--the burning ferry with loaded oil at Port Kavkaz does look impressive. But as I stress non-stop--in the end it is COFM (Correlation of Forces and Means) and posture which dictates approach to any kind of war. NATO has neither, trying to hide behind the backs of VSU. NATO simply doesn't have enough of anything. In other words--NATO cannot assemble and predeploy required force to even have a chance against Russia. At least some people in Pentagon understand it. Pathos-ridden rhetoric from West's "elites" (a euphemism for BS) is just that. NATO is effectively de-militarized now. The required FORCE is not there for NATO, period! The best division-size force packed with US and other "volunteers" has been wiped off the face of the earth in ten days in Kursk. 

White House national security spokesman John Kirby said Friday that U.S. officials have been in near-daily contact with Ukrainian counterparts and have made no recent changes to guidance on how U.S. weapons can be used in the Kursk offensive. “They are allowed to use U.S. provided material to defend themselves against Russian aggression. And, as you know, the president allowed them to use U.S. munitions across that border to deal with imminent threats,” Kirby told reporters in Washington. Kirby added that it's unclear how successful Ukraine's operation in Kursk will be over the long term. Russian officials on Friday reported some success in turning back Ukrainian forces in some areas of the Kursk region.

Oh, it is very clear, Mr. "Admiral" Kirby, very clear.