British "Military" ...

... a euphemism for non-existent army and barely surviving, once glorious, Royal Navy is a misnomer. Nor grossly exaggerated in its rather "real" intel capability MI6 and other orgs of this nature filled with credentialed morons and psychopaths, can fill the void left after discovering that the halcyon days of British Empire are gone forever and UK's future lies now with decaying Europe and whatever the morsels from the table of itself struggling American big guy it may get. In Russia, orgs such as RUSI or Chatham House are used now as memes akin to "British Scientists" and such a use is totally justified. 

So, whenever anyone advances a proposition that British "military" can have any competent opinion on warfare it should be viewed as a bad joke. 

The British military expected to see more of Russia's 'prestige equipment,' like T-14 tanks, fighting in Ukraine, officer says. A British Army officer said that the military was surprised it did not see more advanced Russian weaponry, like some of its best tanks, on the battlefield in Ukraine. "We probably would've expected to have seen more of their prestige equipment," Maj. Maguire told Business Insider, speaking on the condition that only his rank and last name be used. He previously helped lead the UK-led training for Ukrainian soldiers and also produced reports for the UK and allies on tactics in Ukraine and the lessons Western forces could draw from them. One example he gave of Russian equipment that hasn't been seen is the T-14, considered Russia's most advanced tank. That kind of warfighting equipment is what the British military sort of sees as "the pacing threat equipment that we train against."

Major Maguire should not only stop lying (or parading himself as ignoramus) but also try to get REAL military education which requires way more than attending a vocational school at Sandhurst, a 40 week-long "military" course, pompously known as "military academy" or pushing oneself through all kinds of essentially civilian programs to get a "commission". British training of 404 soldiers is known as committing atrocities and acts of outright terrorism. In terms of real warfare, let alone armored warfare--there is a reason why British withdrew remaining Challenger tanks to Western 404 because this piece of shit, which was presented by British "military" as some awesome achievement, is a jalopy not suited for real war and is an embarrassment to tank warfare. Meanwhile, T-14 Armata saw and continues to see active service in SMO, and as I spoke about it yesterday--new generation Arena Active Armor is now being installed on Russian tanks. 

But in general, it is so cute when NATO "officers" most of who have zero grasp of modern warfare and ZERO academic and combat experience in real war, pass judgements in their feeble attempts to cope and suppress emotions on the account of NATO being nothing more than a paper tiger. Those Western officers with honor, integrity and courage, such as Colonel Jacques Baud, among others, are being persecuted because they pointed out a stupefying level of military-intel incompetence in NATO. Per UK--its military "capability" extends no further than state terrorism. With officers like this--they can only fight civilians. 

P.S. T-90M Proryv IS the best tank in the world, no discussion.