When Your Expertise Is ...

 ... in writing all kinds of pseudo-military BS. I stress, again--you cannot explain to average journo anywhere in the wolrd what this thing is. They simply will have difficulties grasping it. Let's start with "nodes" (or nexuses):

PI/L and PH/I are those probabilities (nexuses) where the whole thing collapses on itself even in the "single shot", especially when you consider what highlighted in yellow "engaged in the fire control solution" means. It literally means that your AD complex received this "firing solution" and is capable to perform intercept of anti-shipping cruise missile (ASCM). That is in the fairy tales, of course, and is useless against genuine hypersonic missiles such as 3M22 Zircon or Kinzhal. In this case your kill chain begins to dissolve already at PH--Susceptibility segment. 

So, what then is this news about from the neocon central?

United States destroyers recently received upgrades in hardware and training for defense as China is set to unveil new missiles designed to sink enemy warships. China's Foreign Ministry did not immediately respond to a written request for comment. U.S. defense contractor Raytheon announced on Tuesday that the AN/SPY-6(V)4 radar recently completed its first live test in a maritime environment at the Pacific Missile Range Facility in Hawaii, successfully tracking air and surface targets under various conditions. The AN/SPY-6(V)4 is one of four variants in the SPY-6 radar family for U.S. naval vessels, capable of simultaneously defending against ballistic, hypersonic, and cruise missiles, as well as anti-surface and anti-air threats, and countering jamming and electronic warfare. Unlike ballistic missiles that follow a predictable trajectory, hypersonic missiles—capable of flying over five times the speed of sound—can maneuver during flight, making them difficult to intercept. Three of China's new anti-ship weapons could be hypersonic missiles.

It is impossible to explain to any US media maroon that AN/SPY-6(V)4 is just a better, more sensitive radar of the venerable Spy-1D line into AESA variant, whose task is not "to defend" (radar cannot "defend"--it is merely a part of a complex which actually defends) but provide all it can BEFORE the Engagement phase (see the picture of Kill Chain above) before the actual engagement happens which IS the launch of AD missiles which will be now guided before their Active Radar Seeker captures the anti-shipping missile by means of these guys which "pulse" until the AD missile seeker captures the target and now is in shoot-and-forget mode:  

And here they are: AN/SPG-62 fire control radar. I will omit here discussing Chinese hypersonic missiles such as (for now only claims) YJ-21. If the data about this missile is correct and it does reach terminal while maneuvering at M=10, the US Navy simply has no KINETIC means, yes those AD missiles, to do anything about it, period. Whether the US Navy has SPY 6, or 10, or hell knows what--the Air Defense contour of ANY US Navy's Arleigh Burke-class DDG is simply a weapon complex for XX century threats, it is not designed to engage a single, forget a 2-4-6 etc. salvo of hypersonic weapons, and survive. SM-6, SM-3--these are all weapons conceived and designed in 1990s against the "enemy" which fits into the description of decrepit and backward "opponents" like Iraq or Libya. The US Navy ran into the brick wall of Houthis recently, we all know the result. 

Remember the guy? 

He ripped a new ass-hole to all those "strategists" at the Millennium Challenge 2002. Read it, read it--there is a lesson there, Van Riper used salvos of slow subsonic "Iranian" missiles similar to US Harpoons against the "best fighting force in history". They couldn't handle it. They never could, and we saw the "quality" of the US-made air defense systems in SMO. If you think that adding new radar, however capable, without having kinetic means to defend oneself is awesome--I have a bridge to sell you. Prepayment, I'll give the account number in private. Any takers?

But sheer idiocy of the US "experts" doesn't stop there. Neocons' propaganda machine is hurting. Good, this filth must be removed from positions of power and influence if the US is to survive. 

Russia to reject US and EU offer of security guarantees to Ukraine – ISW report.

Yes, one of a very few times the Institute for Sinecures for War Amateurs such as Keane or Petraeus landed anything reminiscent of the truth is this. Russia can continue with SMO as long as she wants to and convulsions of EU regimes are of no concern to Russians. Why Russia needs to talk to the US I explained so many times that it becomes ridiculous repeating it ad nauseam. Europe is over, the US? Will see.