... I do, however, "like" how Judge Nap uses term "required force"--they don't know what it is in CIA or Pentagon because they have no reference point or culture. US military academies teach shit, some war colleges may have a clue but it is of no use.
Again, COFM is a complex thing. Very complex and it changed since even 15 years ago. Anyone one wants to discuss Salvo Model?
... are irrelevant--a bunch of decomposing states with pathetic militaries, with degenerate cultures and political elites. Cowards and terrorists to boot; so, as was stated by Mr. Lavrov himself--there will be no Europe at the table where conditions will be imposed on NATO.
Russia is talking to the US, Russia is not going to talk to Europe. The only thing these perverts can do is to off Ze because they "protect" him and even if he lives, he will not live long, no matter where he will try to hide.
Please. This constant reference to the Gulf War 1.0 is nauseating. It is Al Bandy's four touchdowns in the game for his Polk High school.
It is not just strategy, however important it is, it is a combination of many factors, including foundational ones, the cultural DNA of the US confabulated military history turned into mythology based primarily on a very cautious choice of weak enemies. Here is a reminder from Atkinson about US major hero, who was nothing more than an average army commander.
The creeping arrogance, the hubris, which would cost
the American Army so dearly in Vietnam. Summing up the achievements of his
troops in crushing the German counterattack of December 1944, Patton with
pardonable pride claims to have “moved farther and faster and engaged more
divisions in less time than any other army in the history of the United
States—possibly in the history of the world... No country can stand against
such an Army.” These memoirs are valuable not least in showing, however
unwittingly, that a disastrous presumption of invincibility took root in the
ranks of officers who led the American military after World War II.
Nothing changed since then, period. In fact, things got worse, much worse. Especially in educational level of the US officer corps and very low level of operational planning and execution. The problem is manifold and it is vertical in nature--from lowest tactical level way up to the political top and, in the end, technological obsolescence of the US military, especially when compared to Russia. But Mearsheimer knows very little about it.
These are not just land attack missiles which, of course, matter. These are 3M22 Zircons which are carried by Gorshkov-class frigates which matter the most. Of course, they are capable of land attack too. Here is a reminder what Zircon is.
But these are anti-shipping missiles which can penetrate any even super-pooper AD, which the US Navy doesn't have. Actually Zircon's is up to M=10 and the range of 1,500 km. At least somebody understands in Pentagon.
... the nature of war. Some people INSIDE the US military system did understand it but as a system the US military is not designed to fight a real war.
And then, there is this "teeny-weeny" factor of not a single US military man or woman ever fighting in defense of the United States. They simply have no cultural, psychological and spiritual "organ" which knows what that is. And yes, USAF with its confabulated history of "successes" against mighty Taliban Air Force or Iraqi so called "air defense" is not the pool of military professionals from which you can draw a person who can grasp the realities of modern warfare. Here I agree with Larry Wilkerson wholeheartedly.
But apart from obviously cult movies This is the Spinal Tap and A Few Good Men where Jack simply obliterated Tom Cruise as an actor, what else is out there? As tragic as Reiner's family death is, in some sense it is a classic case of Revolution devouring its own children. It is the fate of Hollywood in a sense, where a bunch of uneducated but "high" IQ babyboomers decided that they know better--they don't. They failed in the most important human endeavor--to bring up children where they become good humans. Per Trump ... no ...
... Jack #7 is produced in Lynchburg, TN. This is the only thing I drink, but Tequila people should keep in mind ... Larry gives some excellent commentaries, which also explain why I think Trump Admin dropping any pretense is good and why, in the end, it may work for the US.
Yes, this is a great interview of Colonel Macgregor to Judge, but Judge's quip about Air Force and Army at 28:50 is as hilarious as it is accurate))
Now to a point that Acqua brought to our attention and that fits extremely well in my thesis that American "realists" are nothing more than collection of American exceptionalists--a euphemism for imperialists--with milder more aesthetically acceptable manners. These were and are the guys who played all along into the narrative of Russia's weakness and decline (no, Mearsheimer is not alone marked with this dubious distinction) which created the impression among uncultured and badly educated Washington establishment that it can fight and win a war against Russia. Now, that the outcome of the SMO (I stress again--Operation) is not (it never was) in doubt for the combined West, we have one of those "realist" outlets which is adorned in its writing staff with such amateurs and Russophobes as Anatol Lieven and others coping with the outcome. They wet dream, they wet dream big and here is a wowser from the (former) academic staff of the US Naval War College by Lyle Goldstein. Goldstein proposes to Trump Administration:
1. Do not measure anything Russia produces in US Dollars--it is a fool's errand, a method invented by the white board academic frauds from the Wall Street and Ivy League economics departments, precisely the thing which brought about geopolitical defeat of the combined West which turned out to be military and economic paper tiger.
2. $1 billion, while a large sum of money, is by no means something dramatic or astronomical for Russia and her budget. E.g. non-existent and over budget (and already delayed) US Navy's new SSBN of Columbia-class WILL cost around $9-10 billion per a single sub, for the same price Russians already built EIGHT (5 operational, 3 getting ready) state-of-the-art SSBNs of Borei-class, which carry weapons which make SLBM Trident -II D5 look like a backwater.
Goldstein should know this, he taught at the USNWC. In the end, it is a respectable educational institution. And then there are THESE guys.
And not only--Russia's Arctic research and development programs dwarf anything combined West can even dream about--after all; it is all about capability. Goldstein does refer to them, somewhat ... but then arrives to a completely out of the blue conclusion about North Sea Route (NSR).
Yet despite incremental progress, Chinese and Russian analysts are aware that the Arctic passage will never achieve its true potential without Western backing.
What? I understand where Goldstein comes from and not all of it is bad, but that is a complete delusion. In fact, the growing Russia's military presence in Arctic, including both ground and naval component, is designed precisely to prevent the West from any "backing" of the Arctic passage. Russians know damn well what "true potential" of this passage is and are going it alone. Not to speak of the fact that Trump "lifting sanctions" on Russia (he was the one who boasted about being the most "anti-Russian President" in his first term) is altogether from a parallel universe. Russia is done with the West, period. Combined West lies, cheats, steals and will continue to do so and the only conversations with it is possible with these things in the background.
... about Gorka. Gorka, being a product of UK "intel" by default is a fraud)))
Gorka is no expert, neither are British intel and military circles. They only know how to do false flags and terrorism. Losers, in general. Per Trump having this BSer, well...
... my extremely low opinion of the US, forget about UK chihuahuas, operation planning capabilities. Russians, however, view this NATO catastrophe in Kursk not so much as Cavoli's Plan as much as London's plan with some US "input". Whatever the case is, it doesn't matter now.
It is my contention--NATO simply has no grasp of modern large scale combined arms operations. The numbers of VSU's losses in Kursk are appalling. It is a slaughter.
Trump (and his cabinet) are definitely culpable in what is going on today. The guy couldn't get a decent cabinet in two years, and when he appointed Bolton as NSA--forget it, it was over. Trump, most likely, is going to win elections. You think anything will change? No. It is going to be same ol', same ol', but wrapped into different rhetoric. Medvedev nailed it four days ago--the US is facing the defeat it could never have conceived. Consuming own fairy tales about "defeating Hitler" or "winning the Cold War" will do it to you. Now, the reckoning has come. What are you going to do? Go nuclear? Good luck with that...