Read this attentively:
I will comment in depth on this
later but one thing which is absolutely clear--STOVL concept in Russian Navy
will lead, inevitably, to some sort of a hybrid carrier akin to US Navy's LHA-6 America-class
amphibious assault ships but, in Russian case, most likely with greater
emphasis on the air-wing and self-defense—even most likely making it closer to HMS
Queen Elizabeth carrier of the Royal Navy conceptually. I can already hear sobbing
and cries of desperation from all kinds of Russian navalists still enamored
with the concept of Alfa-strikes and glory of the flying decks of CATOBAR
carriers. I used to be a navalists myself but with the appearance of 4th
generation submarines and weapons such as P-800
Onyx, I got cured and transferred from
the shining light and inherent goodness of the Battle of Midway romanticism to a dark
side of bookkeeping, cynical pragmatism and stand-off weapons. And I mean
STAND-OFF weapons and we all know what they are.
The main question now thus is this: is co-existence of CATOBAR
and STOVL carriers possible in Russian Navy? My answer is: why not. MiG-29K is
a mature program and this excellent aircraft will eventually substitute venerable
SU-33s on a fully upgraded Kuznetsov,
which undergoes a major refit as I type this. As per new STOVL aircraft—let's
wait and see. When Yak-141 first
appeared in late 1980s it was a revolutionary STOVL aircraft; who said that new
one will not be.
No comments:
Post a Comment